Hello and welcome to the very first day of The Hound of the
Baskervilles Week. As I previously
mentioned, I will not be reviewing the silent film because…frankly it is a bit
difficult and we will leave it at that.
That being said I thought we would toddle down to 1939 and tackle the
Basil Rathbone manifestation instead. In
this version Holmes is the butler and maid’s last name was altered to Barryman
rather than Barrymore (due to John
Barrymore’s acting streak and not to confuse audience members). Some reason or another that is an issue of
debate and hopefully cleared up. This is
The Hound of Baskervilles.
So, what do you think of the smoking jacket? |
Sherlock Holmes: There is no doubt of
it in my mind. Or perhaps I should say, my imagination. For that is where
spoilers are conceived and they’re solved- in the imagination.
Brought to us by director Sidney Lanfield (Cheer Up
and Smile, Three Girls Lost, Hush Money, Red Salute, My Favorite Blond and
Where There’s Life) and produced by 20th Century Fox this was
the first of the fourteen movies based on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s character
Sherlock Holmes.
Holmes (Basil Rathbone of The Last Days of Pompeii,
Captain Blood, The Adventures of Robin Hood, The Sun Never Sets and The House
of Fear) and Watson (Nigel Bruce of
Escape!, I Was a Spy, Murder in Trinidad, The Lady is Willing, The Spider Woman
and The Woman in Green) are in for the evening when they receive a visit
from Dr. Mortimer (Lionel Atwill of
Night Monster, Captain America: The Serial, House of Frankenstein, Sherlock
Holmes and the Secret Weapon, Fog Island and House of Dracula) who warns
the duo of the impending arrival of Sir Henry Baskerville, the last of the line
and heir to the estate in Devonshire. He begins to explain that Baskerville
Hall is cursed by a demonic beast, a veritable hellhound that killed Sir Hugo
Baskerville hundreds of years ago and believes in his heart that this creature
roams the moors to kill all Baskervilles.
BAD DOG!!! DOWN!!! |
Naturally Holmes views it as tittle-tattle or poppycock if
you will, then Mortimer tells the events leading to his best friend Sir Charles
Baskerville’s ghastly death. Found dead
in his garden without so much as a mark on his body but his face was contorted
into sheer terror. The official
inquisition did not make the village aware that around his body some distance
away was gigantic paw prints. Mortimer
failed to mention this because no one would have believed him in the
slightest.
Holmes sends Watson to Baskerville Hall along with young Sir
Henry, stating he is far too busy to attend them at this time and Watson is to
keep a wary eye of the goings on there.
I had just a few comments to make at this time. I have heard constant complaints of the lack
of Victorian times rather than the contemporary settings of Rathbone’s Sherlock
Holmes movies and I am proud to say this actually holds to that time period but
it is the only of the series that does. During the latter 1930s to 1940s
Rathbone’s Holmes was a war hero thwarting the Nazi regime and while it did
detract from its original beginnings it brought hope and strength to the
fighting boys overseas to see a classic English hero as a spy buster across the
pond. Not to be too fan boy but this is
one of my favorite versions of this classic chilling tale. FYI, be on the lookout for character actor
John Carradine in this film.
Doctor, please remove your hand from my knee. |
No comments:
Post a Comment